Criminal Defence Case Studies
Drug, Firearm & Weapons Offences with Driving Charges
Court: Broadmeadows Magistrates' Court
Charges: Drive Unlicensed (Road Safety Act 1986), Use Unregistered Motor Vehicle on a Highway (Road Safety Act 1986), Possess & Traffick Drug of Dependence (Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981), Possess Firearm (Firearms Act 1996), Resist Police Officer (Crimes Act 1958), Possess Controlled Weapon (Control of Weapons Act 1990)
Charges: Drive Unlicensed (Road Safety Act 1986), Use Unregistered Motor Vehicle on a Highway (Road Safety Act 1986), Possess & Traffick Drug of Dependence (Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981), Possess Firearm (Firearms Act 1996), Resist Police Officer (Crimes Act 1958), Possess Controlled Weapon (Control of Weapons Act 1990)
225+ Google Reviews
How We Revoked a Supervision Order in the County Court of Victoria
This case study involves a 33-year-old man who was represented in the Broadmeadows Magistrates' Court facing multiple serious criminal charges including:
- Drug possession and trafficking
- Firearm and weapons offences
- Resisting police
- Driving offences
Police discovered prohibited drugs, a firearm, and a controlled weapon after attempting to arrest him for unlicensed driving in an unregistered vehicle.
Given his extensive criminal history and the serious nature of the charges, he faced a real risk of a lengthy prison sentence. He engaged our experienced criminal lawyers in Melbourne and specialist drug and firearm defence lawyers to reduce his prison exposure and preserve opportunities for rehabilitation.
- Drug possession and trafficking
- Firearm and weapons offences
- Resisting police
- Driving offences
Police discovered prohibited drugs, a firearm, and a controlled weapon after attempting to arrest him for unlicensed driving in an unregistered vehicle.
Given his extensive criminal history and the serious nature of the charges, he faced a real risk of a lengthy prison sentence. He engaged our experienced criminal lawyers in Melbourne and specialist drug and firearm defence lawyers to reduce his prison exposure and preserve opportunities for rehabilitation.
Background to the Supervision Order
Police identified our client driving while unlicensed in an unregistered vehicle. When they attempted to arrest him, he resisted police. A subsequent search revealed:
Multiple quantities of drugs of dependence, consistent with possession and trafficking
A firearm and a controlled weapon
Our client had a difficult personal background, including:
Early school leaving and behavioural challenges
Alcohol and cannabis use from age 17
Diagnosed anxiety, depression, and PTSD
One child and family responsibilities
A significant prior criminal record
Our Legal Strategy
With such a broad range of charges, our focus was on minimising custody and ensuring rehabilitation remained central to sentencing. We:
Compiled comprehensive submissions on his mental health and its role in the offending
Presented personal history and parenting responsibilities to demonstrate rehabilitation potential
Negotiated charge resolution to keep the matter in the Magistrates' Court rather than being escalated to the County Court
Argued for a balanced sentence that addressed community protection but provided access to treatment programs
By targeting the sentencing principles under the Sentencing Act 1991, we positioned the case to achieve the shortest possible custodial term with structured post-release support.
Outcome – Reduced Prison Term & Community Corrections Order
At the plea hearing, the Broadmeadows Magistrates' Court imposed:
- 2 months imprisonment (significantly shorter than expected for this range of offences)
- An 18-month Community Corrections Order with rehabilitation-focused conditions
This meant our client could access treatment and support services during the CCO while limiting his prison exposure to the minimum necessary.
- 2 months imprisonment (significantly shorter than expected for this range of offences)
- An 18-month Community Corrections Order with rehabilitation-focused conditions
This meant our client could access treatment and support services during the CCO while limiting his prison exposure to the minimum necessary.
Why This Case Matters
Cases involving drug trafficking, firearm possession, weapons offences, and resisting police almost always lead to substantial prison terms particularly with a long criminal record. This case demonstrates that with the right criminal lawyer in Melbourne:
Prison time can be reduced, even in high-risk matters
Matters can be kept in the Magistrates' Court to avoid higher jurisdiction penalties
Rehabilitation-focused sentencing can be achieved for serious offences
Frequently Asked Questions – Supervision Orders in Victoria
What is the penalty for drug trafficking in Victoria?
Under the Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981, drug trafficking can attract lengthy prison terms. Sentencing depends on the type and quantity of drugs, criminal history, and mitigating factors.
Can firearm charges be defended?
Yes. A criminal lawyer in Melbourne can challenge the evidence, legality of the search, or the element of possession. Where conviction is inevitable, they can argue for a reduced penalty.
Will resisting police lead to jail?
It can, particularly when combined with other serious charges. However, with skilled representation, alternatives such as fines, community orders, or reduced custodial terms may be possible.
Can multiple serious charges be resolved in the Magistrates' Court?
Yes, depending on the seriousness and maximum penalties. A criminal defence lawyer can negotiate with prosecutors to keep matters in the Magistrates’ Court, where maximum sentences are lower.
How can Emma Turnbull Lawyers help?
We are experienced criminal lawyers in Melbourne specialising in drug, firearm, weapons, and violent offence cases. We fight to reduce prison time, secure rehabilitation-focused outcomes, and protect your future.
DISCLAIMER
This is a real case study from an actual matter in our files. We always change details in our case studies to protect client confidentiality, but the charge and the outcome are exactly as they occurred in court. We publish these case studies to give a genuine insight into the types of results we achieve and the range of sentences that may be imposed. Every case is different, and we can't guarantee the same result in your matter. We choose to share some cases because they are representative of typical results, and others because they stand out for exceptional outcomes.