Criminal Defence Case Studies

Firearms, Drugs & Handling Stolen Goods

Court: County Court of Victoria Melbourne

Charges: Handling stolen goods ×2 Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 88, Reckless conduct endangering life Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 22, Possess unregistered general category handgun ×2 Firearms Act 1996 (Vic) s 7B, Possess unregistered category A longarm Firearms Act 1996 (Vic) s 6A(1), Possess a drug of dependence (cannabis L, purpose related to trafficking) Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) s 73, Possess a drug of dependence (methylamphetamine, purpose related to trafficking) Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) s 73, Possess cartridge ammunition without licence ×2 Firearms Act 1996 (Vic) s 124(1), Unlawful assault with a weapon Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic) ss 23–24, Deal with property suspected of being proceeds of crime Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 195, Possession of a registered category B longarm without licence Firearms Act 1996 (Vic) s 6(2)
4.9/5 225+ Google Reviews

Case Overview 

This case study involves a 28-year-old man charged with breaching a Family Violence Intervention Order (FVIO). The FVIO prohibited all contact with the affected family members (AFMs) and included a full exclusion condition from their residence.

The breach occurred when our client entered the AFM's home and remained there until police arrived. He already had a significant criminal history and was serving a prison sentence at the time of this breach.

Case Background

Police linked our client to a stolen caravan and later stolen vehicles. Allegations were resolved on a handling basis (not theft). A modified firearm and ammunition were found in a satchel linked to him, with DNA confirming contact.

Key incidents included:
 Reckless conduct endangering life: a lever-action rifle discharged from a high-rise apartment into a nearby residence.
 Road-rage incident: prosecution alleged our client brandished a silver revolver on a freeway, forming the assault with a weapon and handgun possession charges.
A search of the apartment uncovered:
 Three more firearms (including a sawn-off shotgun and a registered category B longarm held without licence)
 Ammunition compatible with the seized weapons
 Cash suspected to be proceeds of crime
 Keys to stolen vehicles

 The prosecution focused heavily on community risk and general deterrence for firearms offending. The defence confined the allegations to handling stolen property and accepted drug possession for a trafficking purpose.

Our client had a long-term partner, dependent family members, and stable housing. He lived with enduring neurodevelopmental conditions (language disorder, specific learning disorder, ADHD) arising from premature birth, which affected reasoning and decision-making. He also had a long history of stimulant misuse from adolescence.

A neuropsychologist confirmed permanent cognitive impairments, recommended medication, and identified structured, meaningful work as protective. He received a disability support pension, had intermittent work capacity, and benefitted from routine and supervision. Our Approach – Strategic Defence in High-Stakes Firear

Our Approach – Strategic Defence in High-Stakes Firearms & Drug Cases

As experienced criminal defence lawyers in Melbourne, we:
 Resolved the indictment on agreed facts, removing theft allegations and limiting possession periods.
 Centred rehabilitation: residential treatment at The Cottage, daily structure, therapy, ongoing psychology, documented abstinence, and aftercare.
 Humanised risk: detailed neurodevelopmental profile explaining impulsivity and poor judgment.
 Showed real-world supports: family references, employer and community letters, proof of financial and emotional support for dependants.
 Addressed delay and COVID impacts on proceedings and custody conditions.
 Guarded totality: ensured firearms conduct integral to other offences wasn't double-counted.

The Outcome – Custody with Pathway to Release

The County Court stressed the need for deterrence and community protection but credited:

- The guilty plea

- Verified rehabilitation

- Family hardship and community engagement

- Structured progress through residential rehab and aftercare

Our client was sentenced to:

- Total effective sentence: 5½ years' imprisonment

- Non-parole period: 3 years

- Fines: $1,000 total on ammunition-possession charges

Why This Case Matters

Cases involving firearms, reckless conduct, and drug trafficking attract long jail sentences in Victoria. This case shows that early engagement with a criminal lawyer in Melbourne, credible rehabilitation evidence, and a fact-focused defence can substantially influence the ultimate outcome, even where imprisonment is unavoidable.

Frequently Asked Questions - Firearms & Drug Charges in Victoria

It means the prosecution alleges you intended to sell, supply, or distribute the drug, not just use it personally.

In serious cases, prison is common. However, your sentence can be reduced with strong mitigation evidence and skilled legal advocacy.

Yes. Even small amounts of methamphetamine are treated seriously in Victoria, but with the right drug lawyer in Melbourne, courts may impose diversion, fines, or community orders instead of prison.

Reckless conduct involves creating a serious risk of death, even if no injury occurs, whereas assault requires a direct act towards a person.

Do I need a specialist criminal lawyer in Melbourne for firearms cases?

Yes. These matters are high-risk and require targeted legal strategies to reduce penalties and avoid overreach by the prosecution.

In some cases, if the evidence is weak, the breach was accidental, or there are legal defences, a lawyer can negotiate withdrawal or downgrading of charges.

DISCLAIMER

This is a real case study from an actual matter in our files. We always change details in our case studies to protect client confidentiality, but the charge and the outcome are exactly as they occurred in court. We publish these case studies to give a genuine insight into the types of results we achieve and the range of sentences that may be imposed. Every case is different, and we can't guarantee the same result in your matter. We choose to share some cases because they are representative of typical results, and others because they stand out for exceptional outcomes.

Ready To Protect Your Rights?

 Book your consultation today.