Criminal Defence Case Studies

Robbery, Deception & Driving Offences

Court: Melbourne Magistrates' Court

Charges: Obtain Property by Deception × 4, Attempt to Obtain Property by Deception × 19, Theft, Careless Driving, Unlicensed Driving, Drive Whilst Exceeding Prescribed Concentration of Drugs, Fail to Answer Bail, Robbery, Contravention of Community Corrections Order
4.9/5 225+ Google Reviews

Case Overview – Robbery & Deception Melbourne

This case study involves a 33-year-old man facing multiple serious criminal charges, including armed robbery, deception offences, theft, and driving while disqualified. The most serious allegation involved an armed robbery at gunpoint, where a substantial amount of cash was taken from a retail store.

Given his extensive criminal history and the fact he was already on a Community Corrections Order (CCO) at the time, imprisonment was inevitable. Our role was to minimise total custody and ensure all matters were resolved in a single sentencing process.

Case Background

Our client's history included:
 Developmental trauma and PTSD
 Diagnosis of ADHD
 Lived with bipolar disorder
 Multiple prior court appearances and periods of imprisonment
 Subject to a 5-year SOPO with strict behavioural and reporting requirements

The charges arose from a series of incidents:

 An armed robbery where the victim was threatened with a firearm
 Multiple deception and attempted deception offences
 Theft from retail premises
 Driving offences, including careless driving, unlicensed driving, and driving with drugs in his system
 Failing to answer bail and breaching the terms of a CCO


Our Legal Strategy – Limiting Jail Time

Our experienced criminal defence team in Melbourne:
 Consolidated all charges from different matters so sentencing could occur in one hearing, avoiding cumulative sentences from multiple courts
 Presented extensive background evidence on the impact of trauma, substance dependency, and mental health issues
 Argued for the shortest possible non-parole period to support rehabilitation
 Highlighted time already served in custody prior to sentence, seeking to ensure minimal further imprisonment

Outcome – Reduced Non-Parole Period

The Melbourne Magistrates' Court sentenced our client to:

- 12 months imprisonment

-6 month non-parole period

- Licence cancellation and 12-month disqualification

- A fine in addition to the custodial sentence

By managing the case strategically, we avoided cumulative terms from multiple matters and limited overall time in custody.

Why This Case Matters

Armed robbery and deception offences are high-stakes criminal charges in Victoria, often resulting in lengthy jail sentences, especially for clients with extensive criminal histories.

This case shows the critical importance of strategic case management as consolidating matters, presenting strong mitigation, and ensuring sentencing is conducted as one process can dramatically reduce total custody time.

Frequently Asked Questions 

Armed robbery is theft committed with a weapon or threat of a weapon. It is a serious indictable offence that typically results in imprisonment.

This offence occurs when someone dishonestly obtains property by deception. It can be charged as a summary or indictable offence depending on the value.

Yes. Even small amounts of methamphetamine are treated seriously in Victoria, but with the right drug lawyer in Melbourne, courts may impose diversion, fines, or community orders instead of prison.

Yes. Courts can consolidate charges from different matters into a single sentencing hearing to avoid cumulative sentences..

How does criminal history affect sentencing?

Extensive criminal history typically results in harsher sentences, but skilled advocacy can still achieve outcomes that minimise total custody.

We are specialist criminal defence lawyers in Melbourne with experience in complex multi-charge matters, often achieving consolidated sentences that reduce total custody.

DISCLAIMER

This is a real case study from an actual matter in our files. We always change details in our case studies to protect client confidentiality, but the charge and the outcome are exactly as they occurred in court. We publish these case studies to give a genuine insight into the types of results we achieve and the range of sentences that may be imposed. Every case is different, and we can't guarantee the same result in your matter. We choose to share some cases because they are representative of typical results, and others because they stand out for exceptional outcomes.

Ready To Protect Your Rights?

 Book your consultation today.