Criminal Defence Case Studies
Possession of a Trafficable Quantity of Firearms
Court: County Court of Victoria Ballarat
Charges: Theft Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), Possession of a drug of dependence (methylamphetamine) Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic), Unauthorised possession of a trafficable quantity of firearms, Possessing firearms contrary to a Firearms Prohibition Notice, Handling stolen goods Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), Unlicensed driving, Possession of a prohibited weapon without exemption Control of Weapons Act 1990 (Vic)
Charges: Theft Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), Possession of a drug of dependence (methylamphetamine) Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic), Unauthorised possession of a trafficable quantity of firearms, Possessing firearms contrary to a Firearms Prohibition Notice, Handling stolen goods Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), Unlicensed driving, Possession of a prohibited weapon without exemption Control of Weapons Act 1990 (Vic)
225+ Google Reviews
Case Overview
This case study involves a man facing multiple serious charges, including possession of a trafficable quantity of firearms, drug possession, theft, handling stolen goods, and weapons offences. With a significant criminal history, adverse forensic evidence, and a Firearms Prohibition Notice already in place, he was at real risk of a lengthy prison sentence.
Through strategic advocacy, we secured a total effective sentence of 2 years 9 months with a moderated non-parole period, giving our client a defined release pathway and recognition for his rehabilitation prospects.
Case Background
Police alleged that our client:
- Stole a wallet containing cash and personal items
- Was later seen riding a motorcycle while unlicensed
- Was linked to a search of residential addresses and an unregistered Mazda, where police located the stolen wallet and cash, 14.2 grams of high purity methylamphetamine, two shortened .22 calibre rifles (one with a partially erased serial number), and a triple-edged knife
Forensic testing located his fingerprints on the firearms, motorcycle, and vehicle. The Mazda bore stolen number plates.
- Stole a wallet containing cash and personal items
- Was later seen riding a motorcycle while unlicensed
- Was linked to a search of residential addresses and an unregistered Mazda, where police located the stolen wallet and cash, 14.2 grams of high purity methylamphetamine, two shortened .22 calibre rifles (one with a partially erased serial number), and a triple-edged knife
Forensic testing located his fingerprints on the firearms, motorcycle, and vehicle. The Mazda bore stolen number plates.
The prosecution did not allege the firearms were intended for criminal use, but argued that concealable, illegal firearms present a significant community danger, especially when possessed in breach of a Firearms Prohibition Notice.
Our Approach - Strategic Defence in Serious Firearms & Drug Cases
Our lawyers developed a targeted defence strategy to limit the scope of the allegations and maximise mitigating factors. We:
Confined liability to what could be proven, ensuring no allegation of planned criminal use of the firearms.
Advanced Bugmy v The Queen principles, explaining how a childhood marked by deprivation, family violence, and instability reduced moral culpability.
Presented strong rehabilitation evidence, including abstinence and program participation in custody, family support, remorse, and prospective employment upon release.
Argued for totality and concurrency to prevent double counting between the firearms and prohibition notice breaches.
The Outcome - Moderated Non-Parole Period
The Ballarat County Court accepted the seriousness of possessing two shortened firearms but also acknowledged:
- No evidence of planned criminal use
- Our client's rehabilitative progress and insight
- The need to encourage reintegration
- The need to encourage reintegration
Our client was sentenced to:
- Total effective sentence: 2 years 9 months' imprisonment
- Non-parole period: 20 months
- Orders: Forfeiture of firearms; disposal orders for drugs, weapon, and plates
- Credit for pre-sentence detention applied
- Total effective sentence: 2 years 9 months' imprisonment
- Non-parole period: 20 months
- Orders: Forfeiture of firearms; disposal orders for drugs, weapon, and plates
- Credit for pre-sentence detention applied
Why This Case Matters
In Victoria, illicit firearms offences, especially when combined with drugs or dishonesty, carry heavy penalties. Where a Firearms Prohibition Notice is in place, the starting point is even higher.
This case shows that even with adverse forensic evidence and an extensive prior record, skilled criminal lawyers in Melbourne can achieve a reduced sentence by focusing on limiting the factual basis of the prosecution case, highlighting rehabilitation and support networks and arguing effectively on totality and concurrency.
Frequently Asked Questions – Firearm Possession in Victoria
Do I need a lawyer if I'm charged with firearms or drug offences?
Yes. These offences carry significant prison terms. Early advice and representation can make a substantial difference to the outcome.
Can I avoid a conviction?
In some less serious matters, yes. But for serious indictable offences involving firearms, avoiding a conviction is rare. The focus shifts to minimising the penalty.
What happens if I plead guilty?
The court will consider your plea in mitigation, your personal circumstances, and your prospects for rehabilitation before determining sentence.
Absolutely. These matters carry lengthy prison terms, and experienced representation can be the difference between the maximum penalty and a reduced sentence.
DISCLAIMER
This is a real case study from an actual matter in our files. We always change details in our case studies to protect client confidentiality, but the charge and the outcome are exactly as they occurred in court. We publish these case studies to give a genuine insight into the types of results we achieve and the range of sentences that may be imposed. Every case is different, and we can't guarantee the same result in your matter. We choose to share some cases because they are representative of typical results, and others because they stand out for exceptional outcomes.